Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump utils for annual limit client fixes #2352

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

whabanks
Copy link
Contributor

Summary | Résumé

This PR incorporates bug fixes to the annual limit redis client.

Related Issues | Cartes liées

Test instructions | Instructions pour tester la modification

TODO: Fill in test instructions for the reviewer.

Release Instructions | Instructions pour le déploiement

None.

Reviewer checklist | Liste de vérification du réviseur

  • This PR does not break existing functionality.
  • This PR does not violate GCNotify's privacy policies.
  • This PR does not raise new security concerns. Refer to our GC Notify Risk Register document on our Google drive.
  • This PR does not significantly alter performance.
  • Additional required documentation resulting of these changes is covered (such as the README, setup instructions, a related ADR or the technical documentation).

⚠ If boxes cannot be checked off before merging the PR, they should be moved to the "Release Instructions" section with appropriate steps required to verify before release. For example, changes to celery code may require tests on staging to verify that performance has not been affected.

@whabanks whabanks merged commit b938585 into main Nov 13, 2024
5 checks passed
@whabanks whabanks deleted the fix/annual-limit-client-bugs branch November 13, 2024 21:32
whabanks added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
whabanks added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants